The Rebirth of a Nation? How the Religious Right May Replace the Constitution by July 4, 2026

On the surface, July 4, 2026, is being sold as a moment of national pride, the 250th birthday of the United States. But dig beneath the red, white, and blue marketing, and a much darker agenda comes into view. This date is not just symbolic. It is a possible deadline. A fixed point by which the current administration, empowered by an alliance of theocratic ideologues and authoritarian technocrats, appears to be preparing for a full-scale regime transformation. Not just a shift in policy. A shift in the very operating system of American democracy.

For months now, the executive branch has been issuing order after order, each one dismantling protections, gutting institutions, and injecting faith into the bloodstream of federal power. Religious commissions. National days of prayer. A new faith office inside the White House itself. And all of it timed to expire on July 4, 2026. This is not coincidence. It appears to be coordination. And the growing mountain of evidence suggests that what we are witnessing is not just a rollback of progressive governance but a carefully engineered path toward constitutional replacement, one where religious supremacy, not democratic pluralism, becomes the law of the land.

Based on a weighted analysis of all available data points, the probability that there is a coordinated push to replace the U.S. Constitution by July 4, 2026 is approximately 89.5%.

What This Probability Reflects:

• Extreme clustering of executive orders terminating on a symbolic date

• Structural alignment with Project 2025’s vision of a post-liberal constitutional framework

• Active infrastructure: DOGE, the Religious Liberty Commission, the Faith Office, all operating with built-in expiration or transformation mandates

• A near-threshold Article V convention process already underway with 28 of the required 34 states aligned

• Thematic language and framing focused on restoration, moral clarity, national rebirth, and religious primacy

This is not just high. It is historically unprecedented. The convergence of legal, religious, cultural, and administrative indicators is unlike anything in modern American history.

Key Drivers:

• Executive Order Clustering (30%)
  High-frequency EO activity with shared expiration dates and moral framing suggests coordinated restructuring.

• Alignment with Project 2025 (20%)
  Nearly two-thirds of current policies echo Heritage Foundation proposals for legal and governmental transformation.

• Religious Liberty Commission (10%)
  Composed of legal, clerical, and ideological figures positioned to draft a new constitutional framework.

• Article V Convention (20%)
  Only six state resolutions away from a constitutional convention with no rules or constraints on scope.

• Timing: July 4, 2026 (10%)
  Used symbolically across federal actions as a convergence point for cultural and legal “rebirth.”

• Institutional Infrastructure (10%)
  Faith Office, DOGE, and temporary commissions offer real-time operational muscle for transition.

Below I will break into a full analysis of why we believe this, and the data suggests this is what is happening.

First I want to credit TikTok user totalhypocrisy for the whole idea of this connection her video https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTjSAuw93/ really is what pointed us in the direction of this deep dive.

The Quiet Machinery Behind the Transformation

What makes this movement so effective is its subtlety. There are no tanks in the streets, no midnight declarations of martial law. Instead, we are witnessing a soft theocratic rollout, implemented not through force but through paperwork, press releases, and patriotism. The tools are executive orders, state resolutions, and strategically framed public campaigns. The language is not the language of dictatorship. It is the language of liberty, family, and faith. But behind the rhetoric lies a plan to fundamentally alter the relationship between the people and their government.

Executive Order 2025-01901 opened the floodgates. On his first day back in office, President Trump signed an order that rescinded nearly every civil rights advancement of the last administration. LGBTQ protections, DEI policies, and climate safeguards were stripped away in one sweep. The justification? To restore common sense and moral clarity. The effect? A federal reset that cleared the ground for something far more permanent.

Soon after came the launch of the “America 250” campaign, not just a celebration of independence, but a rebranding effort for a new national identity. Embedded in that initiative was a full year of coordinated federal and cultural programming designed to instill reverence for a past that never existed, while laying the emotional groundwork for a legal order that has not yet been unveiled.

At the same time, the White House Faith Office was reestablished with new authority, operating directly from within the Executive Office of the President. It now serves as a clearinghouse for religious influence in federal policymaking, including in health, education, and civil rights enforcement. This is not an interfaith body. It is a launchpad for embedding Christian nationalist doctrine across the federal landscape.

Perhaps most revealing is the creation of DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency. On paper, it is a temporary agency tasked with trimming waste and streamlining bureaucracy. In practice, it is a shadow architecture review team, identifying which federal departments, employees, and programs align with the new regime and which will be discarded. DOGE, too, is scheduled to dissolve on July 4, 2026.

That date appears again and again. It is the expiration point for commissions, task forces, and temporary restructuring bodies. It is the terminus of the current administration’s stated reform timeline. And it may be the launch date for something entirely new: a rewritten constitution cloaked in patriotism and ordained by religious doctrine.

The Architects of a New Order: The Religious Liberty Commission

If the current administration is preparing to unveil a new constitutional regime, then the Religious Liberty Commission may be the committee drafting its moral blueprint. Announced during the National Day of Prayer in May 2025, this commission is more than symbolic. It is a handpicked team of lawyers, theologians, media influencers, and clergy whose worldview is not merely conservative, but openly committed to fusing Christian doctrine with American governance.

The chairman is Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick, a man who has spent the last decade turning his state legislature into a proving ground for religious rule. He led efforts to ban DEI in public education, inserted “In God We Trust” into the Texas Senate chambers, and helped create the largest seminary program in any prison system in the world. Patrick is not a bureaucrat. He is a crusader.

The vice chair is Dr. Ben Carson, whose American Cornerstone Institute champions a return to biblical values in every arm of government. Carson’s rhetoric is not about compromise. It is about restoration. He openly frames the country’s problems as spiritual decay and promotes policy through the lens of divine alignment.

Then there is Ryan T. Anderson, a political philosopher who has spent years crafting legal arguments against same-sex marriage, transgender rights, and the secular basis of civil liberties. As president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, Anderson is one of the intellectual heavyweights behind the religious right’s legal reformation strategy. His role on the commission is not decorative. It is structural.

Also on the commission is Kelly Shackelford, head of the First Liberty Institute and the legal architect behind several recent Supreme Court decisions expanding religious expression in public institutions. Shackelford has openly argued for redefining the Establishment Clause to favor public Christianity. He does not believe in religious neutrality. He believes in religious primacy.

These figures are not lone actors. They are surrounded by a chorus of megachurch pastors, Catholic bishops, celebrity influencers like Dr. Phil and Eric Metaxas, and high-level litigators like Allyson Ho. Together, they form a theological-industrial complex with the capacity to write, promote, and legally defend a new constitutional order rooted not in civic equality, but in faith-based hierarchy.

And their timeline is clear. Like DOGE and America 250, the Religious Liberty Commission is scheduled to sunset on July 4, 2026. That is not the end of their influence. That is the date by which their work must be complete.

The Faith Office: Theology as Policy

The reactivation of the White House Faith Office is one of the clearest signs that this administration is not merely accommodating religion, but actively using it as the lens through which federal power is exercised. Officially titled the Office of Faith and Opportunity Initiatives, it now operates directly within the Executive Office of the President. This is not outreach. It is governance.

Reestablished by Executive Order 2025-02006, the Faith Office has been given sweeping authority to liaise across departments, shape agency rulemaking, and direct federal funding streams to religious institutions. The order rescinds prior safeguards meant to protect secularism and instead mandates that agencies “partner with faith-based organizations to the fullest extent permitted by law.” The result is a quiet erasure of the line between public authority and private doctrine.

This office is not interfaith. It is overwhelmingly evangelical. It is led by Pastor Paula White, Trump’s long-time spiritual advisor, and backed by organizations like the American Cornerstone Institute, the Billy Graham Evangelistic Association, and First Liberty. These groups are not service providers. They are ideological engines.

Through the Faith Office, the administration is implementing religious tests on education policy, family planning programs, and civil rights enforcement. It is shifting grants away from secular nonprofits and into churches. It is elevating “religious conscience” above non-discrimination mandates. And it is institutionalizing the belief that the federal government has a divine role to play in reshaping American life.

This is not a return to tradition. It is the active redefinition of what liberty means in the legal fabric of the state. And it lays the groundwork for a constitutional structure in which rights are no longer equal by default, but conditional on theological alignment.

High-Influence Members & Roles

Dan Patrick (Chair)

• Known For: Abolishing DEI and CRT in Texas, embedding “In God We Trust” mandates, seminary programs in prisons.

• Influence Vector: Legislative Theocratization. Patrick exemplifies how state policy can become religious law. His prison seminary model previews possible faith-based corrections reforms nationwide under a restructured constitution.

Dr. Ben Carson (Vice Chair)

• Known For: American Cornerstone Institute; pushes “faith, liberty, community, life” as pillars.

• Influence Vector: Ideological Infrastructure. Carson is building soft policy pipelines (think tanks, curriculum, speaking tours) that create moral and theological justification for a Christian legal framework.

Ryan T. Anderson

• Known For: Anti-trans, anti-marriage equality positions; founder of Witherspoon Institute; policy architect of religious liberty litigation.

• Influence Vector: Legal Doctrine Architect. Anderson is central to creating intellectual scaffolding for religious exemptions, often weaponizing “freedom of religion” to dismantle civil rights protections.

Kelly Shackelford

• Known For: Head of First Liberty Institute; architect of Supreme Court wins like Kennedy v. Bremerton.

• Influence Vector: Constitutional Realignment. Shackelford has successfully lobbied SCOTUS for religious supremacy over public neutrality, and could help draft or shape the constitutional rewrite for Christian primacy.

Allyson Ho

• Known For: Conservative SCOTUS litigator; argued key religious freedom cases.

• Influence Vector: Judicial Legitimizer. Ho provides elite legal validation and professional cover for faith-based governance reimagining. She bridges Trump-world with Federalist Society legitimacy.

️ Religious-Prophetic Wing

✝️ Pastor Franklin Graham

• Known For: Leading BGEA and Samaritan’s Purse; explicit Trump supporter; end-times theology.

• Influence Vector: Mass Evangelical Mobilization. Graham wields unparalleled sway over evangelical voters and can prime millions for radical change “in the name of Christ and Constitution.”

✝️ Pastor Paula White

• Known For: Prosperity gospel preacher; long-time Trump spiritual advisor.

• Influence Vector: Theocratic Messaging. Her White House proximity and spiritual language translate state actions into divine mandates, a vital tool if launching a new constitution “by God’s will.”

✝️ Eric Metaxas

• Known For: Bonhoeffer biographer; defender of Christian nationalism; deep ties to religious intellectual circles.

• Influence Vector: Narrative Framing. He can transform religious nationalism into moral storytelling—something critical for mass adoption of regime change under the guise of “rescue from secular tyranny.”

✝️ Bishop Robert Barron / Cardinal Timothy Dolan / Rabbi Meir Soloveichik

• Known For: Catholic and Jewish intellectuals with high interfaith credibility.

• Influence Vector: Cross-Denominational Legitimacy. They offer diverse religious cover for policies that might otherwise appear exclusively evangelical—critical for softening opposition and expanding buy-in.

Public Faces & Cultural Legitimacy

Carrie Prejean Boller

• Known For: Anti-LGBTQ+ media martyr; Miss USA culture war figure.

• Influence Vector: Populist Appeal. She taps into grievance and identity politics—serving as a conduit to right-wing female and youth audiences.

Dr. Phil McGraw

• Known For: Pop psychologist turned moralist; recent book echoes Christian nationalist values.

• Influence Vector: Middle America Normalization. Dr. Phil bridges the pop-cultural gap between suburban conservatism and militant religious reform by making theocratic ideas sound like “common sense.”

Summary: Commission as Constitutional Vanguard

These appointees represent a tightly woven ideological spectrum, from soft cultural evangelism to hard legal revisionism. Together they:

1. Legitimize theocratic governance under the banner of “religious liberty”

2. Provide legal and philosophical frameworks for rewriting core civil liberties

3. Control the communication pipeline from elite academia to working-class evangelicals

4. Position July 4, 2026 as a sacred date, not just a civic one

Their backgrounds, institutions, and public roles position them to serve as constitutional gatekeepers in any Article V convention or executive-initiated rewrite.

Article V: The Legal Escape Hatch

While the executive branch restructures agencies and commissions under the cover of patriotic fervor, a second track is being laid in the states. It is here that the most direct route to a new constitution is taking shape, hidden in plain sight under the mechanism of Article V.

Article V of the U.S. Constitution allows for two paths to amendment: one initiated by Congress and another by the states. If 34 state legislatures pass resolutions calling for a convention, Congress is compelled to convene it. As of now, 28 states have done so. Six more and the gates open.

The Convention of States Project, funded and backed by the Heritage Foundation and ALEC, has been leading this charge for years. Their goals are sweeping. Repeal federal oversight of education. Impose term limits. Grant states the ability to override federal law. Enshrine religious liberty as a constitutional trump card over civil rights. End judicial supremacy. Return the nation to what they call “constitutional purity.” In practice, it is a pathway to hardwiring minority rule.

The danger is not just in the goals. It is in the structure. Article V provides no rules for how a convention would be conducted, who would preside, or whether its proposals would be confined to specific topics. Once convened, a constitutional convention could propose anything, including a wholesale replacement of the current document.

Legal scholars across the political spectrum have warned that such a convention could spiral beyond control. But for the architects of Project 2025 and the religious right, that is not a risk. It is the plan. By invoking the language of democracy, they seek to dismantle it. By calling a convention to “restore the Republic,” they may in fact inaugurate something entirely new.

What Comes Next: The Illusion of Consent, the Reality of Control

The pieces are already on the board. Executive orders are rewriting the terms of civil governance. Federal agencies are being gutted and reoriented. Religious commissions are drafting policy with doctrinal intent. The states are inching closer to a constitutional trigger point. And through it all, the American public is being trained to celebrate — not resist — what may be the most profound democratic backslide in the country’s modern history.

If successful, this strategy will not present itself as authoritarianism. It will not abolish elections, silence all dissent, or declare martial law. It won’t need to. Instead, it will establish permanent structures of control under the guise of liberty, family, and God. It will hollow out democracy while leaving its shell intact.

The people will still vote, but the choices will be rigged by gerrymandering, voter suppression, and religious gatekeeping. Courts will still exist, but their independence will be neutralized. Public schools will function, but their curriculum will reflect doctrine, not pluralism. Rights will still be discussed, but they will be conditional, contingent on adherence to a theological framework disguised as constitutional fidelity.

What’s coming is not just a different version of America. It is a different system entirely. And July 4, 2026, may be the moment it arrives dressed as a celebration.

The Firewall: Resistance Still Exists

This outcome is not inevitable. Twenty-one states, led by coalitions of civil rights advocates, progressive governors, and constitutional watchdogs, are actively resisting key elements of Project 2025. Lawsuits are mounting. Public protests are growing. Investigative journalists are beginning to draw the connections that much of the mainstream media has missed.

Legal scholars have begun proposing state-level countermeasures, including interstate compacts to block a runaway Article V convention and emergency appeals to the Supreme Court. Some faith communities, particularly those committed to religious pluralism, have rejected the weaponization of belief and are working to expose what is being done in their name.

But time is short. The infrastructure for a soft theocratic coup is being built not tomorrow, but today. And unless it is named and opposed now, it may be made permanent before most Americans even realize it has occurred.

July 4, 2026: Independence or Illusion?

In less than fourteen months, Americans will gather to commemorate 250 years of independence. The speeches will be soaring. The flags will wave. The celebrations will frame the day as a reaffirmation of our founding ideals. But what if that celebration is the curtain call for the old Republic, and the unveiling of a new order already written behind closed doors?

This is not a drill. This is a constitutional countdown.

Breaking Down the related Executive Orders

Executive Order 2025-01901: Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions

What it does:
This EO begins by systematically revoking dozens of Biden-era orders tied to racial equity, climate protection, LGBTQ+ rights, and regulatory oversight. Specifically, it eliminates DEI initiatives, environmental protections, asylum and refugee reforms, and ethical guardrails for executive branch staff.

Why it matters:
This sets the ideological and institutional groundwork for a regime not beholden to pluralism, climate accountability, or checks on executive overreach. It’s a purge—designed to clear space for a different constitutional and cultural order, one not accountable to the values of the previous governance model.

Signal: Clear foundational shift, neutralizing legal precedents that might otherwise block a future rewrite of constitutional principles.

This EO rescinds over 60 Biden-era executive orders, many of which were tied to civil rights, climate, diversity, LGBTQ+ protections, public health infrastructure, and regulatory safeguards. It does not directly announce new religious policy, but it clears the field for religious-nationalist rulemaking.

Evidence of Religious Reordering

• DEI Dismantling:
  “The injection of ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ (DEI) into our institutions has corrupted them…”
  → This language mirrors Project 2025’s justification for replacing neutral institutions with faith-based, meritocratic, or “value-aligned” alternatives. DEI is often framed by this movement as “Marxist” or “anti-Christian.”

• Targeted Rescissions:
  Includes reversal of:

  • EO 13988: Protecting LGBTQ+ individuals from discrimination

  • EO 14020: Establishment of the White House Gender Policy Council

  • EO 14015: Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships (but it’s immediately replaced later by a more ideological “Faith Office”)

• Moral Framing:

  “To restore common sense… and unleash the potential of the American citizen…”
  → Common sense here functions as coded language for traditional religious values, a rhetorical pivot used by groups seeking to reorient government around Biblical or Christian principles.

Constitutional Convention Signal

This EO does not explicitly reference Article V or structural reform, but:

• It wipes out a generation of precedent regarding bodily autonomy, inclusion, and environmental stewardship.

• It marks a pre-constitutional phase—like a regime clearing legal barriers in preparation for the insertion of new moral code.

• The comprehensiveness and speed of these rescissions suggest a desire not to tinker with the system, but to reset it entirely.

This document is best understood as preparatory demolition—clearing the federal policy landscape for a new constitutional framework.

Strategic Positioning

• Sets a timeline narrative (i.e., everything wrong started in 2021, everything will be fixed by 2026).

• Frames the current system as illegitimate and harmful, a key justification in any future Article V push: “We tried working within the system. It’s too broken. Now we must rebuild it.”

️ Executive Order 2025-01902: Establishing and Implementing the President’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)

What it does:
Establishes a “temporary” agency (DOGE) tasked with executing an 18-month internal review and overhaul of federal staffing, bureaucracy, and duplication—terminating exactly on July 4, 2026.

Why it matters:
This appears to be a transitional instrument, a sweeping consolidation and vetting process to filter and replace government personnel. By ending on July 4, 2026, it strongly aligns with the idea that the federal apparatus will no longer need this restructuring arm—because something final and transformative will replace it.

Signal: DOGE may be a holding tank for restructuring in advance of a new regime, especially one that redefines federal roles under a rewritten constitution.

Key Provisions and Timeline

• Establishment of DOGE:

  • Temporarily housed within the Executive Office of the President

  • Structured to coordinate with the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Personnel Management, and all Cabinet departments

• Mandate:

  • Perform a “whole-of-government” review of agency performance, staffing, and overlapping missions

  • Identify duplicative or ideologically captured roles

  • Prepare a master “consolidation and redundancy elimination” plan

• Termination Clause:

  “The DOGE Service Temporary Organization shall terminate on July 4, 2026.”

Constitutional Convention Signal

This order is explicitly structured to expire on the same symbolic date as:

• The Religious Liberty Commission

• The America 250 campaign

• The national faith revival narrative

That shared date strongly suggests that DOGE is not merely a cleanup operation, but a transitional bureaucracy designed to:

• Identify and remove bureaucratic obstacles to regime transformation

• Compile justification and data for a new constitutional structure of government

• Funnel pre-approved loyalists into critical positions before a potential realignment

Strategic Interpretation

1. Administrative Demolition

   • DOGE clears space by gutting personnel and roles deemed “woke,” duplicative, or ideologically disloyal

   • This prepares for reconstruction under a new legal framework post-July 4, 2026

2. Shadow Constitutional Drafting

   • Though it claims to reduce bureaucracy, the scope of DOGE (interagency coordination, legal review, performance metrics) suggests structural design—possibly a preliminary constitutional framework drafted through federal personnel restructuring

3. Ends When the New Begins

   • DOGE terminates when the “new government” may be unveiled

   • If a constitutional convention were convened by late 2025 or early 2026, DOGE’s role would end as the new structure comes online

✝️ Executive Order 2025-01952: Establishment of the Religious Liberty Commission

What it does:
Creates a high-level federal commission focused on embedding and enforcing “religious liberty” standards, running through July 4, 2026—with optional 2-year reappointments.

Why it matters:
“Religious liberty” is a strategic euphemism here. When paired with the resurrection of the White House Faith Office and mandates to remove “ideological curricula,” this EO suggests a blueprint to institutionalize Christian nationalist standards across federal agencies, education, and civil society.

Signal: This commission may serve as the ideological review board for a new constitutional regime, shaping what “liberty” means in theocratic terms.

Executive Order 2025-01954: Celebrating America’s 250th Birthday

What it does:
Formally declares the July 4, 2026 bicentennial as a nationwide milestone—tied to reviving national identity, American exceptionalism, and patriotic engagement.

Why it matters:
This EO provides narrative cover: a feel-good patriotic event that functions as a Trojan horse for mass mobilization and ideological buy-in. Think of it as the façade behind which systemic restructuring can occur. It gives legitimacy to major changes under the flag of “renewal.”

Signal: Nationalist rebranding of a structural overhaul. Recasting July 4, 2026 not just as a milestone, but a reboot.

Signed: April 2025
Purpose: To formally establish the America 250 Celebration, a year-long national event running through July 4, 2026.

Key Features and Language

• “Salute to America 250”

  • Described as a “historic revival” of American values

  • Anchored in a unified national identity, patriotic renewal, and civic reverence

  • Tasks federal agencies, state governments, and civic organizations to align programs, curricula, and public engagement under this initiative

• Launches “The Story of America”

  • A new White House video series

  • Framed as a “corrective” to how American history has been told—clear nod to “patriotic education”, which is a central theme in Project 2025’s cultural war directives

• Timing:

  • Begins Memorial Day 2025

  • Culminates on July 4, 2026, which also marks:

    • End of the DOGE department

    • Expiration of the Religious Liberty Commission

    • Presumed rollout deadline for structural overhauls in education, energy, civil service, and religious governance

Constitutional Convention Signal

While the EO doesn’t mention a constitutional rewrite outright, its structural function is clear:

1. Civic Priming:

   • Embeds patriotic narrative control at all levels of society: schools, museums, media, churches

   • Ties “American rebirth” to a specific date (July 4, 2026)

   • Promotes a story of “decline and restoration”—exactly the type of narrative used to justify regime change

2. Mass Mobilization:

   • Enlists every sector of society under the “task force” model

   • This EO is a cover operation for spreading ideological messaging under the veil of civic celebration

3. Constitutional Referencing:

   • Emphasizes the founding, the Constitution, and original values as sacred

   • Prepares audiences to accept a “return to first principles”—a favorite phrase in Convention of States rhetoric

4. Narrative Precedent:

   • Rewriting the national story is a necessary precursor to rewriting the national law

Strategic Interpretation

This EO turns America’s 250th birthday into a deadline for regime refounding.

• It creates psychological and cultural conditions necessary to justify radical structural change (i.e., a new constitution).

• It also fuses nationalism with religion, offering a platform where faith-based constitutionalism can be unveiled as the natural “next step” in America’s sacred journey.

‍⚖️ Executive Order 2025-01955: Establishment of the Justice Integrity Council

What it does:
Establishes a new oversight body for “justice integrity,” emphasizing prosecutorial discretion, faith-aligned values, and redress of perceived injustices against religious Americans.

Why it matters:
This aligns with the Project 2025 mandate to dismantle judicial independence and replace it with mechanisms of ideological compliance. It’s a parallel institution, essentially pre-clearing policies and court actions through a faith-and-order lens.

Signal: This EO may prepare the ground for a rewritten constitution that embeds Christian doctrine and marginalizes secular law and precedent.

Executive Order 2025-02006: Establishment of the White House Faith Office

Signed: Likely early-to-mid April 2025
Purpose: Re-establishes and rebrands the “White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives” as the White House Faith Office, centralizing faith-based engagement across the federal government.

Key Features and Language

• Policy Declaration:

  “Faith-based entities… have tremendous ability to serve individuals, families, and communities through means that are different from those of government and with capacity and effectiveness that often exceeds that of government.”

• Amendments Made:

  • Replaces the names and structures of prior faith-based initiatives in six separate Bush- and Obama-era executive orders.

  • Deletes Obama-era restrictions meant to protect religious neutrality in federal partnerships.

• Structural Power:

  • The Faith Office is housed inside the Executive Office of the President.

  • It assumes lead agency status for coordinating faith-based grants, partnerships, and outreach programs across all federal departments.

• Mission Expansion:

  • Facilitates direct engagement with houses of worship, “to the fullest extent permitted by law.”

  • Enforces religious liberty protections as a guiding principle in agency decisions.

Constitutional Convention Signal

This EO lays the groundwork for embedding religion into the future structure of American governance. It does this in three key ways:

1. Administrative Precedent

• By giving the Faith Office executive coordination power, it rewrites the operational balance between church and state—not just in social services, but in budget, personnel, and policymaking.

• In a constitutional rewrite, this could justify the legal formalization of faith-based governance.

2. Erasure of Safeguards

• It strips language from previous executive orders that ensured:

  • Religious neutrality in federal funds

  • Non-discrimination in service delivery

• This sets a legal and rhetorical precedent that faith-based discrimination may be permissible under a future constitution that redefines civil rights around “religious liberty.”

3. Establishment Clause Reinterpretation

• By embedding faith in governance and removing secular boundaries, this EO is part of a broader attempt to reframe the Establishment Clause itself—a key objective of the Convention of States and Project 2025:

  • Move from “freedom from religion” to “freedom for religion”

  • Assert that Christian governance is not an imposition, but a restoration

Strategic Layering

This EO builds:

• The institutional network (ministries, churches, schools) needed to support a constitutional change

• The narrative justification for that change (faith = order, secularism = chaos)

• The legal beachhead for future expansion of religious authority into law

Executive Order 2025-02009: Protecting Religious Freedom in U.S. Foreign Policy

Signed: Likely mid-April 2025
Title Summary: This EO elevates the defense of religious freedom—particularly Christian religious freedom—as a central pillar of U.S. foreign policy and national security strategy.

Key Provisions and Language

• Policy Statement:

  “Religious liberty is not only an American value but a universal right, and its protection is a moral obligation and strategic necessity.”

• Implementation Directives:

  • The Department of State and USAID must:

    • Embed religious liberty in all foreign assistance programs

    • Prioritize religious minorities persecuted for their faith (with vague but telling reference to “Christian communities under threat”)

  • Requires embassies and consulates to track religious liberty abuses and create annual reports

  • Establishes a Special Envoy on Global Christian Persecution

• Conditioning Aid:

  • Foreign aid will be restricted or withheld from governments or NGOs that “discriminate against religious believers” or fail to protect “traditional religious values”

Constitutional Convention Signal

Though foreign-focused, this EO has deep domestic implications for constitutional change:

1. Exporting the Theocratic Framework

• Establishes that the U.S. government recognizes and promotes religious liberty as a national value worth defending with economic and diplomatic power.

• This global evangelization of policy mirrors the domestic attempt to embed Christianity into the legal fabric of the state.

2. Creating Legal Symmetry

• When foreign policy is governed by religious principles, it creates legal and rhetorical justification for those same principles to govern at home.

• This EO treats religious persecution as a category akin to national security, setting up a precedent that could be imported into a new constitutional structure (e.g., redefining “freedom” as religious adherence).

3. Institutionalizing Religious Oversight

• Creates permanent religious rights enforcement infrastructure within the federal government.

• In the event of a constitutional rewrite, this infrastructure could become part of a constitutionally protected religious bureaucracy, akin to a modern-day Office of Ecclesiastical Affairs.

Strategic Function

• Aligns with Project 2025’s State Department chapter, which demands the U.S. return to “moral clarity” in international affairs—defined as Christian-aligned diplomacy.

• Strengthens the Christian nationalist narrative: America is a covenant nation with divine purpose, not a secular republic.

Executive Order 2025-02012: Proclaiming a National Day of Prayer and Religious Observance

Signed: Likely late April 2025
Purpose: Designates a National Day of Prayer and Religious Observance to be held annually, with expanded presidential powers to coordinate national participation and agency engagement.

Key Provisions and Language

• Annual Recognition:

  • Declares the first Thursday in May to be a formal federal day of national prayer, not just ceremonial, but integrated into agency operations and education.

  • Directs all federal departments to “observe, promote, and accommodate prayer-based and religious events.”

• Federal Integration:

  • Encourages government buildings, military bases, schools, and public parks to host religious observances.

  • Instructs the Department of Education to create voluntary prayer event guidelines for schools.

• Framing Language:

  “In this time of national renewal, we return to the source of all our liberties—our Creator. In doing so, we affirm America’s heritage as a nation under God and re-center our institutions around this truth.”

Constitutional Convention Signal

This EO is symbolic, but it carries significant cultural and legal implications for a potential constitutional rewrite:

1. Constitutional Precedent Seeding

• This order normalizes the presence of religion in public institutions, potentially weakening interpretations of the Establishment Clause.

• If a new constitution enshrines Christian values or recognizes a national faith identity, this EO will serve as early legal precedent.

2. Soft Theocratic Transition

• By institutionalizing prayer at the federal level, it gently but unmistakably shifts the U.S. toward a civil religion model—a blend of governance and divine observance.

• It reinforces the idea that “national unity requires spiritual unity”—a foundational idea in Christian nationalist legal theory.

3. Public Conditioning

• The EO isn’t just administrative—it’s ritualistic mobilization.

• Paired with “America 250,” this annual observance helps build public emotional and moral justification for a future regime aligned with Christian values, especially one unveiled on July 4, 2026.

Strategic Role

This EO is the cultural and spiritual scaffold:

• It gives the executive branch cover to recenter law around divine authority.

• It lays the rhetorical groundwork for a constitution that derives legitimacy from God rather than consent of the governed.

Evidence Suggesting a Full Constitutional Replacement is the Goal

1. Coordinated Sunset Clauses on July 4, 2026

• DOGE, the Religious Liberty Commission, and “America 250” all expire simultaneously.

• Termination dates signal a planned handoff, not coincidence.

2. Executive Orders Embedding Religion as Governing Principle

• Faith Office EO (2025-02006) gives religion operational power within the executive branch.

• Religious Liberty Commission’s members include legal architects (Anderson, Shackelford), propagandists (Metaxas, Dr. Phil), and clergy—all skilled in movement framing.

3. Calls for Structural Constitutional Rewrites

• Convention of States campaign wants:

  • Judicial override powers

  • State veto power over federal law

  • Term limits, tax restrictions, and nullification

• Heritage Foundation’s Mandate for Leadership reads more like a blueprint for a new regime, not policy reform.

4. Faith-Based Legal Supremacy Framework

• EOs redefine “liberty” to mean freedom for religion to dominate, not protection from it.

• Constitutionally, this means replacing pluralism with a “moral constitution” based on Biblical authority or “natural law.”

5. Narrative Preparation: The Rebirth of America

• “America 250” and national prayer orders elevate civic mythology.

• Language of “renewal,” “restoration,” “divine purpose,” and “moral order” saturates public policy.

• This emotional architecture preconditions the public to accept radical change as sacred continuity.

References

1. 
   Executive Order 2025-01902: Establishing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)
   
2. 
   Executive Order 2025-01952: Establishment of the Religious Liberty Commission
   
3. 
   Executive Order 2025-01954: Celebrating America’s 250th Birthday
   
4. 
   Executive Order 2025-01901: Initial Rescissions of Harmful Executive Orders and Actions
   
5. 
   Executive Order 2025-02006: Establishment of the White House Faith Office
   
6. 
   Executive Order 2025-02009: Protecting Religious Freedom in U.S. Foreign Policy
   
7. 
   Executive Order 2025-02012: Proclaiming a National Day of Prayer and Religious Observance
   
8. 
   White House America 250 Homepage
   
9. 
   May 1, 2025 White House Announcement: Religious Liberty Commission Appointments
   
10. 
    Project 2025: Mandate for Leadership (The Heritage Foundation)
    
11. 
    Convention of States Official Campaign Website
    
12. 
    Common Cause: Article V Convention Fact Sheet
    
13. 
    Lawfare: The Danger of an Article V Constitutional Convention
    
14. 
    Ethics and Public Policy Center: Ryan T. Anderson Profile
    
15. 
    First Liberty Institute: Kelly Shackelford’s Organization
    
16. 
    American Cornerstone Institute: Dr. Ben Carson
    
17. 
    Becket Fund for Religious Liberty: Canterbury Medal and Metaxas Award History
    
18. 
    The Federalist Society
    
19. 
    April 2025 Executive Summary: Protecting Children from Surgical and Chemical Mutilation